Developing a skill is an important starting point. But on
its own, it does not translate into economic participation, entrepreneurial
readiness, or a sustainable livelihood.
Recent research on business incubation and SME development
offers a useful lens on this gap. The study finds that structured support —
training, mentoring, infrastructure and networking — builds entrepreneurial
skills and innovation capability, which in turn strengthen a person's ability
to mobilise resources, build confidence, and progress toward real venture
outcomes. Training alone is not the outcome; it is the input to a longer
capability-conversion process.
For Jordan, this reinforces a question central to Ostathi's
work: how should learning and skills development be structured so that
participants are equipped to apply their capabilities in real economic
environments, not just to complete a course?
One of the study's central findings is that incubation
support does not create venture success directly. Instead, structured training,
mentoring, infrastructure and networking help entrepreneurs develop the
capabilities needed to identify opportunities, make decisions, innovate, and
mobilise resources.
This distinction matters for workforce and professional
development more broadly. A training intervention can deliver knowledge, but
sustainable capability requires participants to move beyond knowledge
acquisition toward application, problem-solving, decision-making and
opportunity recognition.
This mirrors the broader shift toward structured workforce and capacity development systems,
where skills development is aligned to labour-market requirements and measured
against economic participation rather than course completion.
The research frames entrepreneurial capability development
as interconnected rather than isolated. Entrepreneurial skills strengthen
innovation capability and resource mobilisation; innovation reinforces
confidence and adaptability; stronger resource mobilisation contributes to
venture success. Each stage feeds the next.
The implication for programme design is significant: development
interventions should be built as pathways, not standalone learning activities.
A typical progression looks like this:
This is especially relevant to digital livelihoods, where
technical or professional competencies need to be paired with mentorship,
market awareness, confidence, and real opportunities to apply what has been
learned. Jordan's Ministry of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurshipreflects the same logic, situating digital skills and entrepreneurship within
the country's broader transition toward a digital economy and closer alignment
between education and evolving labour-market demand.
The study also challenges the assumption that development
happens primarily inside a training session. Its incubation model combines training
programmes, infrastructure and networking opportunities as equally weighted
components. Networking gives entrepreneurs access to experts, mentors, and
strategic partnerships; infrastructure gives them the environment to apply and
refine what they have learned.
For digital learning and workforce participation, the
takeaway is direct: effective development ecosystems must connect participants
not only to learning content, but to expert practitioners, mentorship, and
opportunities for professional engagement. This is increasingly relevant as
Jordan strengthens the links between skills development, entrepreneurship and
participation in the digital economy.
The research ultimately describes modern incubators as
integrated developmental platforms that convert structured support into
entrepreneurial capabilities, connecting skills, innovation, networks,
resources, and venture outcomes.
This provides a useful framework for digital livelihoods.
Effective workforce interventions need to move beyond access to training and
create structured connections between skills development, mentorship, practical
application, workforce participation, and economic opportunity.
In Jordan, this approach is reflected in Ostathi Jordan, a
digital livelihoods ecosystem developed by UniHouse Jordan to connect learning and
capability development with professional and workforce participation pathways.
Through verified experts, digital learning infrastructure, and institutional
programme delivery, the platform provides a practical model for connecting
capability development with opportunities for participation in the digital
economy.
This model forms part of UniHouse Jordan's broader approach
to workforce and capacity development, where learning interventions are
designed around capability development, application, and measurable outcomes.
The findings are equally relevant to governments,
educational institutions and development organisations. The researchers
recommend sequenced capability-building initiatives that integrate
training, mentoring and networking rather than treating them as separate
interventions alongside institutional
policies that are explicitly aligned to capability-development objectives.
For programme design, this shifts the guiding question from:
"How many people completed training?"
to:
"What capabilities were developed, how were they
applied, and what pathways did they create?"
That distinction should sit at the centre of how workforce
development initiatives are designed and evaluated if they are meant to produce
sustainable outcomes. An integrated approach to capacity development and workforce systemsconnects skills development with implementation, measurement, and longer-term
economic participation.
The broader lesson from the research is straightforward:
skills create more value when participants have the ecosystem needed to convert
them into capability and action.
For Jordan's evolving digital economy, this means pairing
structured learning with mentorship, practical application, professional
networks and clear pathways to workforce participation. The future of digital
learning is not simply about expanding access to training — it is about
building digital livelihood ecosystems that move people from learning, to
capability, to meaningful economic participation.
This article draws on and contextualises findings from the
original research by Soumya Mukherjee and Mrinal Kanti Das, Business
Incubation Support and Venture Success: A Capability-Building Model for SME
Entrepreneurs, published in Future Business Journal, Volume 12,
Article 244 (2026). The study was published on 3 August 2026 and is based on
quantitative data from 367 entrepreneurs with direct experience in incubation
programmes.